Goth's Gone "Soft" | Haute Macabre

Goth’s Gone “Soft”

Has It?

Discuss.

[ Please, That Is . . . ]

Samantha on Instagram
Samantha
Wilde is on my side.

21 Comment

  1. I must show my thanks to you for rescuing me from such a setting. Because of looking through the world wide web and seeing proposals which are not helpful, I thought my entire life was over. Being alive devoid of the answers to the problems you’ve solved all through the article is a crucial case, as well as ones which may have in a negative way affected my career if I hadn’t discovered the blog. Your primary capability and kindness in dealing with all things was useful. I am not sure what I would have done if I had not come across such a stuff like this. It’s possible to now look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for your professional and results-oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to propose your web sites to any individual who needs and wants guide on this matter.

  2. The most important thing I have to say is: Brown hair sucks from here to eternity.

    I blame Avril Lavigne for this phenomenon (is it?), seriously, although you may think nobody gives a damn fuck about her, she is very important in this (it hurts to say) soft goth crap. That girl is the epitome of what mediocre narrowminded people consider as goth and/or punk.

    It is so safe and silly. “Good Christian girls could, maybe, wear black nailpolish once IF it is sort of a trend and they friends are doing it too”

    The poor girl even stated that she would dye her hair all blonde and wear a white dress to her wedding (eventhough she is so badass she would wear a black dress and those cheap hot topic pink clip ons) because she wouldn’t want her grandchildren to have that bad image of her grandma.

    Fuck you soft goth prudes.
    Give me that fur hooded thing, and get out of my sight!

    For them, it is a phase 😉

  3. Nixon,

    What’s a “butt cut”? [ Not even joking. . . for obvious reasons, I’m guessing : parted-down-the-middle ? ]

    Otherwise, oh, how I love Haute Macabre commentary!

    [ Who, me? ” Bait ” people ? Whatever do you mean? ]

    But seriously though :

    Ditto, majority above—though I do like the idea of [ quote ] an ” albino Goth . ”

    Any old schoolers who remember Propaganda‘s coverage of the Countess Bathory ?

    When I was 15, I thought that model [ ” Tia, ” if memory serves ] was IT.
    Nostrilla notwithstanding, even. . .

    *[ Oops, & there that evil smirk emerges ! ]*

    John Koviak, Paris Sadonis : same [ adoration from my †+† bleached-black soul †+† . . . & stacks of baaaaad bi-polar poetry ] ; though all of that’s a ‘ given ,’ isn’t it?

    Oh.But.Wait, Oh.But.Wait, Oh.But.Wait ! Another question :

    Not a single mention of the black head-pieces . [ ” Hats ” ? More like frames. ]

    Am I the only person who kind of doesn’t hate them ?

  4. It’s not any sort of goth let alone soft. As has been said, a load of eye liner and a few black clothes don’t make it goth. They wouldn’t know Siouxsie Sioux if she bit them on the bum. It’s fashion grasping for an edge of difference and missing the mark as far as establishing what that edge it. There are some nice pieces but nothing memorable.

  5. Let me get this straight, Wang has gone soft? poor guy. Seriously though, I think the term “soft” is inaccurate, one of the designers mentioned sophistication which brings to mind that these lines were intended to create a goth look that has matured even though I feel they failed. I’d love to bring back McQueen to show them how Goth should be done. Or we could just takes notes from this Siouxsie video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5iMaQfmXVQ

  6. uggghhhh. i hate everything this video chooses to be. I can’t even. its just a bit of gothy elements into non goth clothes, goth hasn’t gone soft, the designers have just realized that goth is amazing so they try to include it in stuff they been doing. theres not alot of clothes in this video that I would even want to try on, let alone those shades of greens or reds by that one designer with that one shoulder sleeved mullet dress.

  7. This would be like me adding some khaki slacks to my normal ensemble and saying ‘Business Casual has gone Punk/Hardcore’. Except some of these outfits looked OK, and that would just look stupid. But there was nothing remotely new, how long has high-fashion been borrowing fetish-y elements? And that unfortunate combination of dark lipstick and eyeliner with ‘natural’ skin and hair has been around for ages too.

  8. Oh this was a giggle. Its as if they plucked the key words to name drop to make them “edgy”. It would have been ok if they are just said they were going for a darker aesthetic. Even the hair stylists were a laugh, oh this one i’m going suzie sioux, and this one is heavy metal cos is matte.

    Just a flash in the pan sweeping statment lumping dark elements under one catch phrase umbrella to make them seem hip and now – remember its goth but sophiscated. *face palm*

  9. I really feel like they’re just not using the right term for it. Like, if they plan on releasing much more goth looks for F/W then, sure, use the term. However, describing the garments in the video, it really didn’t jibe. Sure, they have darker influences and sure, they’re not going for classic goth, they are innovative, fashion forward people therefore something new is bound to come out but I feel like most of these garments are too much of a stretch in too little time to peg the term ‘goth’ to.

  10. I think the world of haute couture and runway fashion is totally different from alternative fashion. It may have “goth” influences, but it does not constitute goth fashion, which is part of a subculture. They’re just separate realms.

  11. @ Red – it *can* be lovely when the two intersect because it means that for a brief moment you can find some spectacular clothes ar regular stores with all the “right” elements. “Right” for me of course means victoriana 🙂 I personally have no issue with designers testing the warters of the darker subcultures, they just shouldn’t *also* assume that that means thier designs in turn define what darker asthetics are.

  12. Hey, emaciated, pale models look good in anything! But I agree with Photographer Leia that the designers here are simply plucking elements from various subcultures and calling it all “soft goth”. Everyone wants to coin a new style. Meh.

  13. Why oh why is it always “goth” when models have eyeliner overload and long hair worn loose? Clothes-wise, I see some gothic influences in those clothes but not that much. Ho-hum.

  14. I agree with Photographer Leia. It’s tough to make a convincing argument with weak elements: might as well argue that Goth’s gone soft b/c Kim Kardashian wore some black eyeliner once (my point being that the examples need to be more relevant). It’s also pretty misguided to make the “soft” claim using high-fashion elements b/c that implies that high fashion defines Goth aesthetics. It doesn’t, though it can be lovely when the two intersect.

  15. How can they say that it’s goth that has gone soft, when all they have as evidence is a bunch of designers hand picking dark aesthetic elements from a myriad of subcultures and including it in their fashion? It’s a pretty weak argument if you ask me.

Comment

Shares